ChristosZosi [Mon, 14 Nov 2022 05:18:47 +0000 (06:18 +0100)]
Add support for the configUSE_TASK_FPU_SUPPORT constant in the GCC/ARM_CR5 port (#584)
* Add support for the configUSE_TASK_FPU_SUPPORT in the GCC/ARM_CR5 port
This is done almost identically as in the GCC/ARM_CA9 port
* Adjust task stack initialitation of the GCC/ARM_CR5 port
Ensure that the task stack initialization is done correctly for the
different options of configUSE_TASK_FPU_SUPPORT.
This is very similar to the GCC/ARM_CA9 port. The only meaningful
difference is, that the FPU of the Cortex-R5 has just sixteen 64-bit
floating point registers as it implements the VFPv3-D16 architecture.
You may also refer to the ARM documentation
* Add support for FPU safe interrupts to the GCC/ARM_CR5 port
Similar to GCC/ARM_CA9 port
* Clarify comment about the size of the FPU registers of Cortex R5
Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS [Tue, 8 Nov 2022 08:35:35 +0000 (14:05 +0530)]
Fix context switch when time slicing is off (#568)
* Fix context switch when time slicing is off
When time slicing is off, context switch should only happen when a
task with priority higher than the currently executing one is unblocked.
Earlier the code was invoking a context switch even when a task with
priority equal the currently executing task was unblocked. This commit
fixes the code to only do a context switch when a higher priority
task is unblocked.
Niklas Gürtler [Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:22:24 +0000 (19:22 +0200)]
Removed the 'configASSERT( xInheritanceOccurred == pdFALSE )' assertion from xQueueSemaphoreTake as the reasoning behind it is wrong; it can trigger on wrongly on highly-contested semaphores on multicore systems. See https://forums.freertos.org/t/15967 (#576)
Jeff Tenney [Mon, 3 Oct 2022 19:39:17 +0000 (12:39 -0700)]
Tickless idle fixes/improvement (#59)
* Fix tickless idle when stopping systick on zero...
...and don't stop SysTick at all in the eAbortSleep case.
Prior to this commit, if vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() happens to stop
the SysTick on zero, then after tickless idle ends, xTickCount advances
one full tick more than the time that actually elapsed as measured by
the SysTick. See "bug 1" in this forum post:
https://forums.freertos.org/t/ultasknotifytake-timeout-accuracy/9629/40
SysTick
-------
The SysTick is the hardware timer that provides the OS tick interrupt
in the official ports for Cortex M. SysTick starts counting down from
the value stored in its reload register. When SysTick reaches zero, it
requests an interrupt. On the next SysTick clock cycle, it loads the
counter again from the reload register. To get periodic interrupts
every N SysTick clock cycles, the reload register must be N - 1.
Bug Example
-----------
- Idle task calls vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep(xExpectedIdleTime = 2).
[Doesn't have to be "2" -- could be any number.]
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() stops SysTick, and the current-count
register happens to stop on zero.
- SysTick ISR executes, setting xPendedTicks = 1
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() masks interrupts and calls
eTaskConfirmSleepModeStatus() which confirms the sleep operation. ***
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() configures SysTick for 1 full tick
(xExpectedIdleTime - 1) plus the current-count register (which is 0)
- One tick period elapses in sleep.
- SysTick wakes CPU, ISR executes and increments xPendedTicks to 2.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() calls vTaskStepTick(1), then returns.
- Idle task resumes scheduler, which increments xTickCount twice (for
xPendedTicks = 2)
In the end, two ticks elapsed as measured by SysTick, but the code
increments xTickCount three times. The root cause is that the code
assumes the SysTick current-count register always contains the number of
SysTick counts remaining in the current tick period. However, when the
current-count register is zero, there are ulTimerCountsForOneTick
counts remaining, not zero. This error is not the kind of time slippage
normally associated with tickless idle.
*** Note that a recent commit https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/commit/e1b98f0
results in eAbortSleep in this case, due to xPendedTicks != 0. That
commit does mostly resolve this bug without specifically mentioning
it, and without this commit. But that resolution allows the code in
port.c not to directly address the special case of stopping SysTick on
zero in any code or comments. That commit also generates additional
instances of eAbortSleep, and a second purpose of this commit is to
optimize how vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() behaves for eAbortSleep, as
noted below.
This commit also includes an optimization to avoid stopping the SysTick
when eTaskConfirmSleepModeStatus() returns eAbortSleep. This
optimization belongs with this fix because the method of handling the
SysTick being stopped on zero changes with this optimization.
* Fix imminent tick rescheduled after tickless idle
Prior to this commit, if something other than systick wakes the CPU from
tickless idle, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() might cause xTickCount to
increment once too many times. See "bug 2" in this forum post:
https://forums.freertos.org/t/ultasknotifytake-timeout-accuracy/9629/40
SysTick
-------
The SysTick is the hardware timer that provides the OS tick interrupt
in the official ports for Cortex M. SysTick starts counting down from
the value stored in its reload register. When SysTick reaches zero, it
requests an interrupt. On the next SysTick clock cycle, it loads the
counter again from the reload register. To get periodic interrupts
every N SysTick clock cycles, the reload register must be N - 1.
Bug Example
-----------
- CPU is sleeping in vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep()
- Something other than the SysTick wakes the CPU.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() calculates the number of SysTick counts
until the next tick. The bug occurs only if this number is small.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() puts this small number into the SysTick
reload register, and starts SysTick.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() calls vTaskStepTick()
- While vTaskStepTick() executes, the SysTick expires. The ISR pends
because interrupts are masked, and SysTick starts a 2nd period still
based on the small number of counts in its reload register. This 2nd
period is undesirable and is likely to cause the error noted below.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() puts the normal tick duration into the
SysTick's reload register.
- vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() unmasks interrupts before the SysTick
starts a new period based on the new value in the reload register.
[This is a race condition that can go either way, but for the bug
to occur, the race must play out this way.]
- The pending SysTick ISR executes and increments xPendedTicks.
- The SysTick expires again, finishing the second very small period, and
starts a new period this time based on the full tick duration.
- The SysTick ISR increments xPendedTicks (or xTickCount) even though
only a tiny fraction of a tick period has elapsed since the previous
tick.
The bug occurs when *two* consecutive small periods of the SysTick are
both counted as ticks. The root cause is a race caused by the small
SysTick period. If vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() unmasks interrupts
*after* the small period expires but *before* the SysTick starts a
period based on the full tick period, then two small periods are
counted as ticks when only one should be counted.
The end result is xTickCount advancing nearly one full tick more than
time actually elapsed as measured by the SysTick. This is not the kind
of time slippage normally associated with tickless idle.
After this commit the code starts the SysTick and then immediately
modifies the reload register to ensure the very short cycle (if any) is
conducted only once. This strategy requires special consideration for
the build option that configures SysTick to use a divided clock. To
avoid waiting around for the SysTick to load value from the reload
register, the new code temporarily configures the SysTick to use the
undivided clock. The resulting timing error is typical for tickless
idle. The error (commonly known as drift or slippage in kernel time)
caused by this strategy is equivalent to one or two counts in
ulStoppedTimerCompensation.
This commit also updates comments and #define symbols related to the
SysTick clock option. The SysTick can optionally be clocked by a
divided version of the CPU clock (commonly divide-by-8). The new code
in this commit adjusts these comments and symbols to make them clearer
and more useful in configurations that use the divided clock. The fix
made in this commit requires the use of these symbols, as noted in the
code comments.
* Fix tickless idle with alternate systick clocking
Prior to this commit, in configurations using the alternate SysTick
clocking, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() might cause xTickCount to jump
ahead as much as the entire expected idle time or fall behind as much
as one full tick compared to time as measured by the SysTick.
SysTick
-------
The SysTick is the hardware timer that provides the OS tick interrupt
in the official ports for Cortex M. SysTick starts counting down from
the value stored in its reload register. When SysTick reaches zero, it
requests an interrupt. On the next SysTick clock cycle, it loads the
counter again from the reload register. The SysTick has a configuration
option to be clocked by an alternate clock besides the core clock.
This alternate clock is MCU dependent.
Scenarios Fixed
---------------
The new code in this commit handles the following scenarios that were
not handled correctly prior to this commit.
1. Before the sleep, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() stops the SysTick on
zero, long after SysTick reached zero. Prior to this commit, this
scenario caused xTickCount to jump ahead one full tick for the same
reason documented here: https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/59/commits/0c7b04bd3a745c52151abebc882eed3f811c4c81
2. After the sleep, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() stops the SysTick
before it loads the counter from the reload register. Prior to this
commit, this scenario caused xTickCount to jump ahead by the entire
expected idle time (xExpectedIdleTime) because the current-count
register is zero before it loads from the reload register.
3. Prior to return, vPortSuppressTicksAndSleep() attempts to start a
short SysTick period when the current SysTick clock cycle has a lot of
time remaining. Prior to this commit, this scenario could cause
xTickCount to fall behind by as much as nearly one full tick because the
short SysTick cycle never started.
Note that #3 is partially fixed by https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/59/commits/967acc9b200d3d4beeb289d9da9e88798074b431
even though that commit addresses a different issue. So this commit
completes the partial fix.
* Improve comments and name of preprocessor symbol
Add a note in the code comments that SysTick requests an interrupt when
decrementing from 1 to 0, so that's why stopping SysTick on zero is a
special case. Readers might unknowingly assume that SysTick requests
an interrupt when wrapping from 0 back to the load-register value.
Reconsider new "_SETTING" suffix since "_CONFIG" suffix seems more
descriptive. The code relies on *both* of these preprocessor symbols:
A meaningful suffix is really helpful to distinguish the two symbols.
* Revert introduction of 2nd name for NVIC register
When I added portNVIC_ICSR_REG I didn't realize there was already a
portNVIC_INT_CTRL_REG, which identifies the same register. Not good
to have both. Note that portNVIC_INT_CTRL_REG is defined in portmacro.h
and is already used in this file (port.c).
* Replicate to other Cortex M ports
Also set a new fiddle factor based on tests with a CM4F. I used gcc,
optimizing at -O1. Users can fine-tune as needed.
Also add configSYSTICK_CLOCK_HZ to the CM0 ports to be just like the
other Cortex M ports. This change allowed uniformity in the default
tickless implementations across all Cortex M ports. And CM0 is likely
to benefit from configSYSTICK_CLOCK_HZ, especially considering new CM0
devices with very fast CPU clock speeds.
* Revert changes to IAR-CM0-portmacro.h
portNVIC_INT_CTRL_REG was already defined in port.c. No need to define
it in portmacro.h.
* Handle edge cases with slow SysTick clock
Co-authored-by: Cobus van Eeden <35851496+cobusve@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: abhidixi11 <44424462+abhidixi11@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph Julicher <jjulicher@mac.com> Co-authored-by: alfred gedeon <28123637+alfred2g@users.noreply.github.com>
I revised the declaration of single-line pointers by splitting it into
multiple lines. Now, every pointer is declared (and initialized
accordingly) on its own line. This refactoring should enhance
readability and decrease the probability of error when a new pointer is
added/removed or a current one has its initialization value modified.
It removes whitespace characters at the end of lines (empty or
othwerwise) and clear lines at the end of the file (only one remains).
It is an automatic operation done by git.
Restrict unpriv task to invoke code with privilege
It was possible for an unprivileged task to invoke any function with
privilege by passing it as a parameter to MPU_xTaskCreate,
MPU_xTaskCreateStatic, MPU_xTimerCreate, MPU_xTimerCreateStatic, or
MPU_xTimerPendFunctionCall.
This commit ensures that MPU_xTaskCreate and MPU_xTaskCreateStatic can
only create unprivileged tasks. It also removes the following APIs:
1. MPU_xTimerCreate
2. MPU_xTimerCreateStatic
3. MPU_xTimerPendFunctionCall
We thank Huazhong University of Science and Technology for reporting
this issue.
It was possible for a third party that had already independently gained
the ability to execute injected code to achieve further privilege
escalation by branching directly inside a FreeRTOS MPU API wrapper
function with a manually crafted stack frame. This commit removes the
local stack variable `xRunningPrivileged` so that a manually crafted
stack frame cannot be used for privilege escalation by branching
directly inside a FreeRTOS MPU API wrapper.
We thank Certibit Consulting, LLC, Huazhong University of Science and
Technology and the SecLab team at Northeastern University for reporting
this issue.
ARMv7-M allows overlapping MPU regions. When 2 MPU regions overlap, the
MPU configuration of the higher numbered MPU region is applied. For
example, if a memory area is covered by 2 MPU regions 0 and 1, the
memory permissions for MPU region 1 are applied.
We use 5 MPU regions for kernel code and kernel data protections and
leave the remaining for the application writer. We were using lowest
numbered MPU regions (0-4) for kernel protections and leaving the
remaining for the application writer. The application writer could
configure those higher numbered MPU regions to override kernel
protections.
This commit changes the code to use highest numbered MPU regions for
kernel protections and leave the remaining for the application writer.
This ensures that the application writer cannot override kernel
protections.
We thank the SecLab team at Northeastern University for reporting this
issue.
Update of three badly terminated macro definitions (#555)
* Update of three badly terminated macro definitions
- vTaskDelayUntil() to conform to usual pattern do { ... } while(0)
- vTaskNotifyGiveFromISR() and
- vTaskGenericNotifyGiveFromISR() to remove extra terminating semicolons
- This PR addresses issues #553 and #554
* Adjust formatting of task.h
Co-authored-by: Paul Bartell <pbartell@amazon.com>
Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS [Mon, 8 Aug 2022 15:53:29 +0000 (21:23 +0530)]
Generalize Thread Local Storage (TLS) support (#540)
* Generalize Thread Local Storage (TLS) support
FreeRTOS's Thread Local Storage (TLS) support used variables and
functions from newlib, thereby making the TLS support specific to
newlib. This commit generalizes the TLS support so that it can be used
with other c-runtime libraries also. The default behavior for newlib
support is still kept same for backward compatibility.
The application writer would need to set configUSE_C_RUNTIME_TLS_SUPPORT
to 1 in their FreeRTOSConfig.h and define the following macros to
support TLS for a c-runtime library:
1. configTLS_BLOCK_TYPE - Type used to define the TLS block in TCB.
2. configINIT_TLS_BLOCK( xTLSBlock ) - Allocate and initialize memory
block for the task's TLS Block.
3. configSET_TLS_BLOCK( xTLSBlock ) - Switch C-Runtime's TLS Block to
point to xTLSBlock.
4. configDEINIT_TLS_BLOCK( xTLSBlock ) - Free up the memory allocated
for the task's TLS Block.
The following is an example to support TLS for picolibc:
The code block which traverses the list of free blocks to calculate heap
stats used a do..while loop that moved past the end marker when the heap
had no free block resulting in a NULL pointer dereference. This commit
changes the do..while loop to while loop thereby ensuring that we never
move past the end marker.
This was reported here - https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/issues/534
Patrick Oppenlander [Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:39:58 +0000 (20:39 +1000)]
add portDONT_DISCARD to pxCurrentTCB (#479)
This fixes link failures with LTO:
/tmp/ccJbaKaD.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `pxCurrentTCBConst2':
/root/project/FreeRTOS/portable/GCC/ARM_CM4F/port.c:249: undefined reference to `pxCurrentTCB'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.2.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: /tmp/ccJbaKaD.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `pxCurrentTCBConst':
/root/project/FreeRTOS/portable/GCC/ARM_CM4F/port.c:443: undefined reference to `pxCurrentTCB'
Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS [Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:17:17 +0000 (10:17 -0700)]
Ensure that xTaskGetCurrentTaskHandle is included (#507)
This commits adds a check that INCLUDE_xTaskGetCurrentTaskHandle is
set to 1. A compile time error message is produced if it is not set to
1. This is needed because stream_buffer.c uses xTaskGetCurrentTaskHandle.
This was reported here - https://forums.freertos.org/t/xstreambufferreceive-include-xtaskgetcur/15283
Graham Sanderson [Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:27:26 +0000 (12:27 -0500)]
RP2040: Remove incorrect assertion (#508)
After the xEventGroupWaitBits in vProtLockInternalSpinUnlockWithWait there was an assertion about
pxYiledSpinLock being NULL, however when xEventGroupWaitBits returns, IRQs have been re-enabled
and so it is no longer safe to assert on the state which is protected by IRQs being disabled.
Co-authored-by: graham sanderson <graham.sanderson@raspeberryi.com>
Ravishankar Bhagavandas [Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:48:34 +0000 (17:48 -0700)]
Add callback overrides for stream buffer and message buffers (#437)
* Let each stream/message can use its own sbSEND_COMPLETED
In FreeRTOS.h, set the default value of configUSE_SB_COMPLETED_CALLBACK
to zero, and add additional space for the function pointer when
the buffer created statically.
In stream_buffer.c, modify the macro of sbSEND_COMPLETED which let
the stream buffer to use its own implementation, and then add an
pointer to the stream buffer's structure, and modify the
implementation of the buffer creating and initializing
alfred gedeon [Wed, 1 Jun 2022 22:00:10 +0000 (00:00 +0200)]
Add suppport for ARM CM55 (#494)
* Add supposrt for ARM CM55
* Fix file header
* Remove duplicate code
* Refactor portmacro.h
1. portmacro.h is re-factored into 2 parts - portmacrocommon.h which is
common to all ARMv8-M ports and portmacro.h which is different for
different compiler and architecture. This enables us to provide
Cortex-M55 ports without code duplication.
2. Update copy_files.py so that it copies Cortex-M55 ports correctly -
all files except portmacro.h are used from Cortex-M33 ports.
Declare vApplicationMallocFailedHook function in task.h instead in each C heap file (#483)
vApplicationMallocFailedHook was declared in each Heap file. which forces users to declare it and can cause problems if the prototype of the function changes.
Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS [Thu, 3 Mar 2022 23:16:39 +0000 (15:16 -0800)]
Check for add overflow only once (#467)
Update the size calculations such that we only need to check for add
overflow only once. Also, change the way we detect add overflow so that
we do not need to cause an overflow to detect an overflow.
Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS [Mon, 28 Feb 2022 19:59:00 +0000 (11:59 -0800)]
Move MSB check after final size calculation (#463)
We use the MSB of the size member of a BlockLink_t to track whether not
a block is allocated. Consequently, the size must not be so large that
the MSB is set. The check to see if the MSB in the size is set needs to
be done after the final size (metadata + alignment) is calculated.
Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS [Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:52:10 +0000 (10:52 -0800)]
Heap improvements (#462)
* Heap improvements
This commit makes the following improvements:
1. Add a check to heap_2 to track if a memory block is allocated to the
application or not. The MSB of the size field is used for this
purpose. The same check already exists in heap_4 and heap_5. This
check prevents against double free.
2. Add a new flag configHEAP_CLEAR_MEMORY_ON_FREE to heap_2, heap_4 and
heap_5. The application writer can set it to 1 in their
FreeRTOSConfig.h to ensure that a block of memory allocated using
pvPortMalloc is cleared (i.e. set to zero) when it is freed using
vPortFree. If left undefined, configHEAP_CLEAR_MEMORY_ON_FREE
defaults to 0 for backward compatibility. We recommend setting
configHEAP_CLEAR_MEMORY_ON_FREE to 1 for better security.
3. Add a new API pvPortCalloc to heap_2, heap_4 and heap_5. This API
has the following signature:
void * pvPortCalloc( size_t xNum, size_t xSize );
It allocates memory for an array of xNum objects each of which is of
xSize and initializes all bytes in the allocated storage to zero. If
allocation succeeds, it returns a pointer to the lowest byte in the
allocated memory block. On failure, it returns a null pointer.
Paul Bartell [Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:12:57 +0000 (13:12 -0800)]
Add configUSE_MINI_LIST_ITEM configuration option to enable the MiniListItem_t type. (#433)
* Add configUSE_MINI_LIST_ITEM configuration option to enable the MiniListItem_t type.
When configUSE_MINI_LIST_ITEM == 0:
MiniListItem_t and ListItem_t are both typedefs of struct xLIST_ITEM.
When configUSE_MINI_LIST_ITEM == 1 (the default in projdefs.h):
MiniListItem_t is a typedef of struct xMINI_LIST_ITEM, which contains 3 fewer fields than a struct xLIST_ITEM.
This configuration saves approximately sizeof(TickType_t) + 2 * sizeof( void * ) bytes of ram, however it also violates strict aliasing rules which some compilers depend on for optimization.
configUSE_MINI_LIST_ITEM defaults to 1 when not defined.
* Add pp_indent_brace option to uncrustify config
Improves compliance with the FreeRTOS code style guide:
https://www.freertos.org/FreeRTOS-Coding-Standard-and-Style-Guide.html
Jeff Tenney [Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:44:12 +0000 (12:44 -0700)]
Fix support for stepping tick by xExpectedIdleTime (#73)
* Fix support for stepping maximum number of ticks
This commit fixes support for tickless implementations that call
vTaskStepTick() with the maximum number of allowed ticks to step.
vTaskStepTick()
---------------
Function vTaskStepTick() provides a way for the tickless idle
implementation to account for ticks that elapse during tickless idle.
The maximum number of stepped ticks allowed is the number passed to
portSUPPRESS_TICKS_AND_SLEEP(). It is the number of ticks between
xTickCount and xNextTaskUnblockTime.
vTaskStepTick() is specifically intended for use with tickless idle,
so it always executes with the scheduler disabled. For reference,
compare it with the more general function xTaskCatchUpTicks().
Without this Change
-------------------
Prior to this commit, if a task is supposed to wake at xTickCount ==
0xFFFFFFFF, then when tickless idle ends, function vTaskStepTick()
sets the tick to 0xFFFFFFFF but the task remains on the delayed list
because xTaskIncrementTick() does not execute. One tick later,
xTaskIncrementTick() executes because it's time to increment xTickCount
to 0x00000000. An assertion failure occurs in
taskSWITCH_DELAYED_LISTS() because the delayed task list is not
empty. Other examples of valling vTaskStepTick() with the maximum
allowed number of ticks merely result in a task waking one tick late.
Default Tickless Implementations
--------------------------------
Note that the default tickless implementations never pass the maximum
allowed value to vTaskStepTick(). The default implementations use the
tick interrupt to finish the sleep and allow that one tick to be
counted normally via the tick ISR and xTaskIncrementTick().
* Protect xPendedTicks with critical section
Function xTaskIncrementTick() increments xPendedTicks when the
scheduler is disabled. That function typically executes inside the tick
ISR. So code in xTaskCatchUpTicks() must mask interrupts when modifying
xPendedTicks.
* uncrustify tasks.c
* Update tasks.c
Style changes only - added comment and indentation to the two modified files.
* uncrustify
* Add test coverage for new conditional
* Add typecast
Co-authored-by: Cobus van Eeden <35851496+cobusve@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph Julicher <jjulicher@mac.com> Co-authored-by: RichardBarry <3073890+RichardBarry@users.noreply.github.com>
Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS [Thu, 6 Jan 2022 05:14:01 +0000 (21:14 -0800)]
Add a cap to the queue locks (#435)
Add a cap to the queue locks
cRxLock and cTxLock members of the queue data structure count the
number items received and sent to the queue while the queue was locked.
These are later used to unblock tasks waiting on the queue when the
queue is unlocked. The data type of these members is int8_t and this can
trigger overflow check assert if an ISR continuously reads/writes to the
queue in a loop as reported in this issue: https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/issues/419.
Note due to the length of the operation is it not recommended to write to
the queue that many times from an ISR - stream buffers are a better option,
or alternatively, defer the operation to a task by just having the ISR send a
direct to task notification to unblock the task.
This PR caps the values of the cRxLock and cTxLock to the number of tasks in
the system because we cannot unblocks more tasks than there are in the system.
Note that the same assert could still be triggered is the application creates more
than 127 tasks.
Amit Tomar [Wed, 29 Dec 2021 20:53:10 +0000 (02:23 +0530)]
fix alignment exception for ullPortInterruptNesting. (#317)
* fix alignment exception for ullPortInterruptNesting.
While loading (LDR X5, ullPortInterruptNestingConst) the ullPortInterruptNesting
variable, the program control seems to be stuck and there is no abort or stack
trace observed (as there is no exception handler is installed to catch unaligned
access exception).
Program control moves forward, if one just declares this varible to be 2 bytes
aligned but then varible is not updated properly.
One of my colleague, pointed out that issue is due to the fact that
ullPortInterruptNesting must be at 8 bytes aligned address but since
"vApplicationIRQHandler" (that has 4 bytes of address) is sitting between
two 8 bytes aligned addresses that forces ullPortInterruptNesting to be at
4 byte aligned address, causing all sort of mess.
It works on QEMU (on ARM64) as it is, since there is no such check for
unaligned access but on real hardware it is prohibited.
Workaround to this problem is, either we skip 4 byets (using .align 4) after
vApplicationIRQHandler declaration or declare it the end of all declarations.
This commit does the latter one.
Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <atomar25opensource@gmail.com>
* Update portASM.S
Remove 1 tab = 4 spaces
Co-authored-by: Amit Singh Tomar <atomar25opensource@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: alfred gedeon <28123637+alfred2g@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph Julicher <jjulicher@mac.com>
begriffs.com / projects / freertos / log